What Is the Most Cost-Effective Way to Install People Counting?
Technology4 min read

What Is the Most Cost-Effective Way to Install People Counting?

Sensors or AI on cameras? A cost comparison with real numbers.

People counting is the foundation of traffic analytics in retail, malls, airports, and any space open to the public. But before you can benefit from the data, you need to install the system - and the investment required varies enormously depending on the technology you choose.

Important

This article is aimed at companies that want to make data-driven decisions about their spaces. If your organization is not yet ready to act on traffic data, the most economical approach is simply not to install any system.

How People Counting Technology Has Evolved

Evolution of people counting technologies: from infrared sensors to AI on security cameras.

Evolution of people counting technologies: from infrared sensors to AI on security cameras.

Option 1: Traditional Counting Sensors

Specialized people counting sensors have been the standard solution for 30+ years. Their installation follows a well-defined architecture:

1

Hardware per point

Each counting point requires a dedicated sensor (infrared, stereo, or ToF/LiDAR), typically installed above the entrance.

2

Local connectivity

Each sensor connects to a local concentrator or directly to the store network to send data.

3

Cloud aggregation

Data is sent to a central server or cloud platform where it is consolidated and made available for analysis.

Sensor architecture: each counting point requires dedicated hardware connected to the network.

Sensor architecture: each counting point requires dedicated hardware connected to the network.

Option 2: AI on Security Cameras

AI-based people counting uses the security cameras already installed in your spaces - or new standard cameras - to count people through computer vision algorithms:

1

Existing cameras

The system connects to the cameras you already have for security, without requiring new specialized hardware.

2

Edge or cloud processing

A server (on-premise or cloud) processes the video streams and applies the counting algorithm in real time.

3

Centralized analytics

Counts and behavioral data are consolidated on a single platform accessible from any location in the chain.

AI camera architecture: existing cameras feed a central processing server, then the cloud.

AI camera architecture: existing cameras feed a central processing server, then the cloud.

Cost Comparison: Sensors vs AI on Cameras

Traditional SensorsAI (existing cameras)AI (new cameras)
Hardware per point$1,200 – $2,000$0$150 – $400
Installation per point$300 – $600$50 – $100$100 – $200
Total per point$1,500 – $2,600$50 – $100$250 – $600

Note: these costs do not include software licensing, cloud infrastructure, or ongoing maintenance. Those items are similar across technologies and do not significantly change the comparison.

Example: 25 Counting Points

Consider a retail chain that wants to install counting at 25 entrances across its stores:

Counting pointsTraditional sensorsAI (existing cameras)AI (new cameras)
25~$50,000~$1,875~$10,625

AI on existing cameras is approximately 25x cheaper than sensors. Even installing new cameras for the AI system is ~5x cheaper than dedicated sensors.

Conclusion

If your spaces already have security cameras - as most retail, mall, and airport environments do - AI-based people counting is the most cost-effective option by a large margin. The only scenario where sensors might be preferred is in environments without any cameras, where privacy constraints prevent camera installation, or where extreme precision in very specific conditions is required (such as outdoor counting in direct sunlight).

Want to see how AI on your existing cameras would work in practice?

Request my demo